THE CRIMSON GROUP, INC.
CONSULTING AND LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN HEALTH CARE
Home Programs Faculty Research Curriculum Center Public Resources My Account
Member Sign In
Shopping Cart  
My Account
My E-Packets
Browse Bibliography:
By Keywords:
 

By Type:
New/Updated Items
Popular Items
Cases
Background Notes
Primers and Books

By Functional Area:
Finance/Financial Management
Financial Accounting
Financial Analysis and Management
General Management
Management Accounting
Management Control Systems
Marketing
Operations Management
Organizational Behavior

By Setting:
Developing Country
For Profit
Health Policy
Healthcare Management
Nonprofit
Nonprofit Organization Management
Public Sector Management

Curriculum Center Browse Bibliography Build EPacket Pricing Structure Distribution Process Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations
 
Industrial Electronics, Inc.
Author(s):
Merchant, Kenneth A.
Functional Area(s):
   Management Accounting
   Management Control Systems
   Organizational Behavior
Setting(s):
   For Profit
Difficulty Level: Beginner
Pages: 2
Teaching Note: Available. 
Copyright Clearance Fee:  $9.00  Sign in to find out if you are eligible for an Academic Price of $5.00 
Add Item to a new E-Packet

Add To Cart

Order an Free Inspection Copy

Back to Bibliography
First Page and the Assignment Questions:
My division had another great year last year. We all worked hard, and the results were there. But again we got no reward for our hard work. It's very frustrating.
    —Division Manager, General Products Division, Industrial Electronics, Inc.

Industrial Electronics, Inc. (IE) produced a wide range of electronic equipment, including signal sources, test equipment, communications systems, and various piece parts and subassemblies such as motors, generators, and probes. Total annual sales were in excess of $8 billion. IE's stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

The company's objective was to maximize shareholder value. In most of its business areas, IE had to be innovative to stay ahead of the competition. However, price competition was also significant, so the company also had to maintain tight control over costs.

The company was organized by product line. Its 16 relatively autonomous divisions were managed as profit centers. The division managers reported to one of four Business Group managers who, in turn, reported to the company's CEO.

Thirty managers, including all line managers at the level of division manager and above plus key corporate staff managers, were eligible for an annual management bonus award. (Many lower-level employees were included in a separate “management-by-objectives” incentive plan.) The management bonuses were based on company-wide performance. Each year, a bonus pool equal to 10 percent of the corporation's profit after taxes in excess of 12 percent of the company's book net worth was set aside for assignment as bonuses to managers. This amount was divided by the total salary of all the executives eligible for a bonus. This yielded an “award per dollar of salary.” The maximum bonus paid was 150 percent of salary.

Historically IE's managers had been earning bonuses that ranged from of 30-120 percent of salary, with the average approximately 50 percent. But because of the recession in the years 2000 and 2001, the bonus pool was zero.

Complaints about the management bonus system had been growing. Most of them stemmed largely from division managers whose divisions were performing well, even while the corporation as a whole was not performing well. These managers believed that the current bonus system was unfair because it failed to properly recognize their contributions. The quote cited at the beginning of the case was representative of these complaints.

Assignment

1.    (20%)     Calculate the bonus award (as a percent of base salary) that would be given to the manager of each of the following four divisions under the proposed new bonus system. These divisions are representative of the range of divisions within IE. (All numbers in $000) [Table omitted from web page]

2.    (20%)     Evaluate (i.e., discuss the pros and cons of) the current bonus system.

3.    (30%)     Evaluate the proposed bonus system.

4.    (30%)     Propose a bonus system that you believe is optimal for IE.

 Why do you think your proposed system is optimal? Explain.