Puente Hills Toyota |
|
|
Management Accounting |
|
Management Control Systems |
|
|
Intermediate |
13 |
Available.
|
$9.00
Sign in to find out if you are eligible for an Academic Price of $5.00
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2003, Howard Hakes, vice president of Hitchcock Automotive
Services, reflected on some of the challenges his team faced in
managing his company’s stable of automobile dealerships. He illustrated
his points by discussing the challenges faced at Puente Hills Toyota,
Hitchcock’s largest dealership, although all of the Hitchcock
dealerships faced essentially the same problems.
This is very much a people business. It’s people who give us our
biggest successes as well as our biggest challenges. At our Toyota
store, in sales, I would say that about 20% of our people are loyal to
the company and really want to do a good job. The other 80% are just in
this for the money … and they can make more money here than anywhere
else. Our compensation attracts some very talented people. But some of
these people are sharks who try to get away with whatever they can.
Others have personal problems. They live from paycheck to paycheck;
that is their mentality. Still others are cancers whose bad habits can
spread. We coach and counsel; we give written notices; and for most of
the employees, once they get the message that is the end of the
problems. But for some others …
I think the key to management in this business is all about
managing attitude. How can we keep the team moving in the same
direction, to get everybody to be part of the team, and prevent the
cancers from spreading?
THE COMPANY AND INDUSTRY
Hitchcock Automotive Services was a privately held corporation
comprised of seven automobile dealerships—three Toyota dealerships and
one each for Volkswagen, Ford, Hyundai, and BMW—and a large body shop.
All of the entities were located in Southern California. Four of the
dealerships, including Puente Hills Toyota, were situated adjacent to
each other in City of Industry, California, about 25 miles east of Los
Angeles. The others were located in Anaheim, Hermosa Beach, and
Northridge.
It was important for the dealerships to keep two important
constituencies—manufacturers and customers— happy. The manufacturers
allocated larger numbers of their best-selling models to their better
performing dealers. The manufacturers evaluated their dealers in terms
of their abilities to fulfill their market potential: to meet sales
targets the manufacturers set for each geographical trading area, known
as the primary market area. The dealerships also had to satisfy the
manufacturers’ licensing and certification standards. The manufacturers
regularly performed compliance audits to evaluate dealership practices
in comparison with the established standards. However, Howard Hakes
believed that short of flagrant violations of standards (e.g., selling
competing brands under the same roof) fulfilling market potentials was
the primary factor affecting the dealers’ relationships with the
manufacturers. Customer satisfaction was obviously important in
obtaining repeat sales and, hence, future profits.
Assignment
1. Evaluate the performance measurement and incentive
systems used at Puente Hills Toyota. What changes would you recommend,
if any?
2. At Puente Hills Toyota, most employees' variable
incentive pay increases linearly with performance, however performance
is defined; that is, the higher the performance, the larger the bonuses
that are paid. In most large companies, however, particularly at
managerial levels, no bonuses are paid until a minimum level of
performance, such as a budget goal, is exceeded. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of using a reward/performance function
like Puente Hill Toyota's?
3. (When used in conjunction with Kooistra
Autogroep.) When comparing the use of incentives in the Puente Hills
Toyota and Kooistra Autogroep cases, do you believe that incentive pay
is truly effort-inducing; that is, will it drive employees to perform
at their best? If you believe incentive pay is not, in whole or part,
effective in making employees work harder, then what other potentially
useful purposes does variable incentive pay provide for organizations
relying on it, if any?
|
|
|
|